Claremont Serial Killer Perth
- The 'particularly graphic and disturbing' evidence to be presented in the Claremont serial killings trial is one of the reasons why it will be heard by a judge alone, rather than a jury, a Supreme.
- Page 1 of 2 -.sensitive. Claremont Serial Killer. posted in Western Australia: Just got sent this email. Thought it was an interesting read, not sure what to make of it but thought I'd pass.
Claremont serial killings is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Claremont serial killings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. | |||
|
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article title[edit]
I live down the road from Claremont and I've never heard it referred to as the Claremont Murders. Its always been the Claremont Serial Killer. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by203.59.187.214 (talk • contribs) .
- I created the article, knowing of the crime, but living 2 states away. We get a filtered deal here I guess. What did the media call it before the second murder occured I wonder? :) I'm open to renaming. -- Longhair 07:13, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Prior to the second murder, it was still seen as a 'missing persons' case. Anyone who was in WA at the time should remember the 'Have You seen Sarah?' campaign - the posters were everywhere. One breakfast radio crew even thought they could make a joke of it (and were promptly ostracised). I seem to remember the term 'Claremont Killings' being used at one point in time. But it's been the 'Claremont Serial Killer' for most of the time, certainly for as long as the Macro Taskforce has been around. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.12.23.195 (talk) 12:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
External Links[edit]
To me it seems extremely ghoulish to post a link to a site called 'find a grave'. I wonder if the external links should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.136.194 (talk) 15:39, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- That was done by a disruptor and sock-puppeteer. The linkage was sloppily-done anyway and uninformative. I've deleted the section. Retarius Talk 06:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Arrest and name[edit]
The name of the suspect may not be that hard to find, but for now, remember it's under a police/media blackout, and is not stated in any of the references provided in the December 2016 section of article. Wait until there is an official source, guys - it won't be long.
- And there is: http://www.9news.com.au/national/2016/12/23/13/36/man-in-court-for-claremont-serial-killingsHelenabella(Talk) 02:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Claremont serial murders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060408160628/http://www.postnewspapers.com.au/20030201/news/002.shtml to http://www.postnewspapers.com.au/20030201/news/002.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
As of February 2018, 'External links modified' talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these 'External links modified' talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}}
(last update: 15 July 2018).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug) 21:15, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Balancing Subjects[edit]
I believe this Wikipedia page is developing well. However, I believe that the sections for background information and the arrest itself could include more details and how this was important in solving the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stanfojl (talk • contribs) 17:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Get iTunes on iOS, Android, Mac, and Windows
Three young women, all missing from the same place, all the victims of a killer stalking the quiet streets. This is the true story of the Claremont Serial Killings.
Claremont: A well-to-do suburb of big homes, imported cars, highly-educated professionals and prestigious private schools. Where residents live in luxury between the majestic Swan River and the glaring blue Indian Ocean that wrap around the city of Perth on the Western edge of Australia.
High salaries, no crime to speak of, barely a care in the world. Claremont is a lovely place to live. In Perth, it’s the place to live.
There is really only one pub to speak of in Claremont. And one nightclub, about 150m away down a street lined with boutique shops.
The nightspots are a magnet for university students and young professionals looking to have fun. Everyone knows everyone, or at least someone who knows them. In Claremont, there are barely two degrees of separation.
On January 26, 1996, Sarah Spiers headed to Claremont for a night out with friends. Aged 18, she left the nightclub in the early hours and called a taxi from a payphone. The taxi arrived minutes later. But Sarah wasn’t there.
Her disappearance left her family and friends distraught and an entire city wondering. What happened to that smiling, blonde country girl? People don’t just vanish from Claremont.
Less than six months later, Jane Rimmer was out, also in Claremont, also with friends, also blonde and smiling. That smile was evident on CCTV captured inside the hotel that night. Those grainy frames showed the 23-year-old walking through the crowded bar area. The tape recording cuts away to another camera. When it cut back, Jane was gone.
Two young women missing in similar circumstances from the same location. Police began to worry they were dealing with a serial killer. When Jane’s body was found in bushland two months later, their worst fears were realised.
Nine months on and Ciara Glennon, a 27-year-old lawyer, was out with work colleagues for a drink. Smart, professional and universally liked, she too vanished. Three weeks later, her body was found, also dumped in bushland.
Three young women, all missing from the same place, all the victims of a killer stalking the quiet streets.
This is the true story of the Claremont Serial Killings.
Also drains power more quickly.Hypersonic Charge (QCF, punch, must be Hyper Sonic)A more powerful Supersonic Charge.Have fun!Every download counts, especially for someone who's just starting out, like me. Hyper sonic mugen char download. So I highly encourage you to try out what I've made.
Three young women, all missing from the same place, all the victims of a killer stalking the quiet streets. This is the true story of the Claremont Serial Killings.
Claremont: A well-to-do suburb of big homes, imported cars, highly-educated professionals and prestigious private schools. Where residents live in luxury between the majestic Swan River and the glaring blue Indian Ocean that wrap around the city of Perth on the Western edge of Australia.
High salaries, no crime to speak of, barely a care in the world. Claremont is a lovely place to live. In Perth, it’s the place to live.
There is really only one pub to speak of in Claremont. And one nightclub, about 150m away down a street lined with boutique shops.
The nightspots are a magnet for university students and young professionals looking to have fun. Everyone knows everyone, or at least someone who knows them. In Claremont, there are barely two degrees of separation.
On January 26, 1996, Sarah Spiers headed to Claremont for a night out with friends. Aged 18, she left the nightclub in the early hours and called a taxi from a payphone. The taxi arrived minutes later. But Sarah wasn’t there.
Her disappearance left her family and friends distraught and an entire city wondering. What happened to that smiling, blonde country girl? People don’t just vanish from Claremont.
Less than six months later, Jane Rimmer was out, also in Claremont, also with friends, also blonde and smiling. That smile was evident on CCTV captured inside the hotel that night. Those grainy frames showed the 23-year-old walking through the crowded bar area. The tape recording cuts away to another camera. When it cut back, Jane was gone.
Two young women missing in similar circumstances from the same location. Police began to worry they were dealing with a serial killer. When Jane’s body was found in bushland two months later, their worst fears were realised.
Nine months on and Ciara Glennon, a 27-year-old lawyer, was out with work colleagues for a drink. Smart, professional and universally liked, she too vanished. Three weeks later, her body was found, also dumped in bushland.
Three young women, all missing from the same place, all the victims of a killer stalking the quiet streets.
This is the true story of the Claremont Serial Killings.
Customer Reviews
See AllInteresting story
Like the podcast except for the loud music with the chimes. it goes on way to long and often
Pretty good true crime reporting
Good start so far. The music is a bit loud and repetitive though
Driver’s License. Drivers license office sanford nc. Road Test. Written Cards.
Bradley Robert Edwards
Peculiar presentation
The Claremont Killer
I am not sure what the thought was in regards to telling you from the beginning who is eventually charged. I am from the states so this is not a familiar story. Had the story been presented like most podcasts, like waiting until the end to give you the conclusion, it would have been much better.